dipenates: (Xander - OMWF)
dipenates ([personal profile] dipenates) wrote2010-03-21 11:15 am

Masculinity and Tenderness, or Why I Find Xander Interesting

[livejournal.com profile] gabrielleabelle  is nothing if not a provoker of thoughts on the Buffyverse, and there's a fascinating discussion going on over at her place about whether Xander is or is not an interesting character. (The jury seems to be coming down on 'is not'.)  This, as with so much her commenters write, got me thinking, and the subsequent tl;dr is a bit much to be contained in comments. 

Firstly, and obviously, it's a good thing that we're all interested in different things. Buffy fandom is incredibly rich precisely because we all have different views on a multiplicity of things, and the huge variety of opinions translates into an amazing bounty of fic that explains, amplifies, critiques and comments on canon. There is something truly awesome about knowing that you can read new  fic every day in Buffy fandom that will make you think about something you've never thought about before.

One of the thing that interests me about Buffy canon is its representation of  sex and gender. A large number of commentators and writers, many rooted in the traditions and culture of fandom, have positioned BtVS as a (third-wave) feminist text. From its opening scene, the show undermines existing tropes about who is and is not a hero(ine), monster, warrior, or victim. This undermining is frequently done along gender lines.

Whether BtVS can be said as a whole to succeed as a feminist text, it has places of both strength and weakness in the narrative arc and perspectives of Xander, who transitions from sexist Everyboy to (somewhat) enlightened Everyman between seasons one and seven. Moments in "The Pack" and "Consequences", particularly, undermine the reimagining of gender roles that the rest of the text undertakes.

If masculinity is defined in a heteronormative world as 'not gay' then this reductive masculinity is insufficiently challenged in BtVS. From what we know about the relationship of the show to the network, it is clear that BtVS was produced at an interesting time for the portrayal of explicitly LGBT characters. Like early Friends finds humour in the assumption of his colleagues that Chandler might be gay, early BtVS finds awkward humour in the notion that Xander might be gay, or thought to be gay. We the audience are not meant to be laughing at Xander's homophobia, but meant to share the anxiety that underpins his interactions with Larry Blaisdell. (Current shows aimed at twenty-somethings and teens respectively, How I Met Your Mother and Glee, have no such difficulty in securing network support for a slightly more nuanced and positive portrayal of LGBT characters.)

Others have written about the hypersexualisation of working class boys/men, but Xander's relentless heterosexuality also strikes me as a counterpoint to his friendship with, and support of, high school girls his own age. It is explicit in the text in Season 1 that Xander does not want to be 'one of the girls', but over-identification with the causes and concerns of young women is problematised for young men under patriarchy.

It might be possible to see the episodes relating to the catastrophic failure of Xander to pursue a sexual relationship as undermining this method of asserting his own masculinity, were it not for "The Pack".  This episode explicitly explores male adolescent sexuality, among other themes. This point is hammered home when Giles, in response to Buffy's delineation of the changes that being possessed by a hyena has wrought in Xander, says, "It's devastating. He's turned into a sixteen-year-old boy." That hyena!Xander is an unpleasant would-be rapist is understandably repulsive to Willow and Buffy, but other characters are more ambivalent. At the end of the episode, it becomes apparent that Xander, contrary to information he has previously provided, remembers the acts of violence and cruelty he perpetuated. Giles, mature adult male, agrees to keep his secret, in an unpleasant moment redolent of 'boys will be boys' tolerance for rapacious sexuality.  

Rape is one of the lightning rods of inequality; a cause and a consequence of women's oppression. However, because of the way strength and power function within BtVS, this is turned on its head. Xander adopts something of a stereotypically female place within his peer group. He is physically weaker, less technologically minded, a victim of violence (although there's a lot of that to go around in BtVS), a provider of food (although he seems to go on less doughnut runs than are talked about), and a doer of scutwork. The moment when this is most savagely described is in "Consequences", when Faith's rape (and murder?) of him is interrupted by Angel. It's obvious that any show that isn't structured like Waiting for Godot is going to need to operate at a pace that makes it impossible for everything that happens to be discussed by all of the available characters. It is striking, though, that this is never mentioned again, to our knowledge, although the attempted rape in "Seeing Red" is the subject of several threads of discussion involving (at different times) Spike, Buffy, Xander and Dawn.

Through seven seasons, Xander moves from an immature, borderline sexually harrassive dynamic with his female friends to a position as something of a pro-feminist ally. He is knowledgeable about gender as it relates to his context ("'Cause witches they were persecuted, Wicca good and love the earth and woman power" - Once More With Feelingand is able to challenge the kind of casually sexist demotic that lards our culture ("See now, I think it's the daddy thing that's throwing her. 'Cause incest --not that sexy." - Seeing Red). He is secure in his position as support staff, as one who helps. For women to be able to be in the spotlight, men have to get out of it, and Xander's reimagining and reworking of his masculinity enables that to happen. Xander: fascinating as all get out. 

Tl;dr: Xander's characterisation is both the awkward spanner in the works of BtVS's feminist text, and one of its most significant developments.  For me.

[identity profile] lusciousxander.livejournal.com 2010-03-21 01:49 pm (UTC)(link)
Great thoughts. I've always found something in Xander that pulled me to his character in ways other characters didn't, and until it was pointed out to me by eowyn_315, I don't think I would've got it.

Xander's character can go as a metaphor for a struggling woman among powerful men, he has to prove himself because he lacks the superpowers and his friends, despite loving him, do think of him as fragile or less than them. Exactly how men view women in some countries.

Xander's struggles have always interested me more than some characters, like Faith for example. I guess reading and watching too much bad character redeemed and becoming good character got a little on the stale side.

Give me good characters who struggle with moral issues and insecurities, way more relatable and interesting.

[identity profile] dipenates.livejournal.com 2010-03-21 07:28 pm (UTC)(link)
Exactly how men view women in some countries.

Or all countries! ;) (This does not, of course, mean all men in those countries feel/act this way.)

I know what you mean about Xander being much more relatable, although I do love a well written Faith.

ext_7259: (Default)

[identity profile] moscow-watcher.livejournal.com 2010-03-21 02:43 pm (UTC)(link)
Interesting. I'm not much versed in feminism, so your essay was very enlightening.

As I wrote in my comment to original post, Xander became interesting to me as soon as I started writing him. I pitted him against Buffy in a situation where both are partly wrong and partly right. And he totally held his own, and I could "see" and "hear" him, and didn't sound false. At least, to me.

Since that time I dig him and I agree with people who find the character interesting and even fascinating.

[identity profile] dipenates.livejournal.com 2010-03-21 07:25 pm (UTC)(link)
As I wrote in my comment to original post, Xander became interesting to me as soon as I started writing him. I pitted him against Buffy in a situation where both are partly wrong and partly right. And he totally held his own, and I could "see" and "hear" him, and didn't sound false. At least, to me.

This is really interesting. I liked Xander in the show, but identified way more with the female characters. However, when I started reading fic I wanted gen, and fandom (particularly [livejournal.com profile] nwhepcat's fiction) provided a Xander that was complex and interesting, and offered a fantastic point of view for analysing canon.

I think Xander is a really well fleshed out character in canon, and, because he is the subject of fewer big plot arcs, his identity seems more stable and congruent than some of the others. For me, that makes him a really solid base for post-Chosen fic, and I love reading what others have produced in that line.
ext_7259: (Default)

[identity profile] moscow-watcher.livejournal.com 2010-03-21 07:34 pm (UTC)(link)
Oh, I adore Nwhepcat's stories. I love her "Keeper of the book" and "Dormant Magic" and "Lilac City". I think he's interesting for both male and female writers because he's a character who subverts so many stereotypes including gender ones.
(BTW, your fic "Five Times People Noticed Xander's Bruises didn't all come from Patrol" is one of my favs, too.)

[identity profile] dipenates.livejournal.com 2010-03-21 10:23 pm (UTC)(link)
Yep, Lilac City is one of my faves too. (And thanks for saying that "Five Times" is one of yours. It was the first thing I wrote in Buffy fandom and it is very dear to my heart.)

[identity profile] ceciliaj.livejournal.com 2010-03-21 03:51 pm (UTC)(link)
Nice post. Xander is pretty spectacular, as far as I'm concerned, although his behavior at certain points (Hell's Bells!) totally baffles me.

[identity profile] dipenates.livejournal.com 2010-03-21 07:31 pm (UTC)(link)
On one level "Hell's Bells" is completely batshit insane.

However, I suppose you could create an argument that it's kind of the nadir of Xander struggling with his privilege. If marriage is the purest expression of patriarchy then entering into it will give him a power (in the eyes of the world) that he doesn't have without it, but it will also sever his connection with the woman-positive world of Slayage.

Or, it's just Joss sprinkling the wheatgerm of gloom and misery atop the cornflakes of the happy relationship, as per usual.
Edited 2010-03-21 19:32 (UTC)

[identity profile] gabrielleabelle.livejournal.com 2010-03-21 10:24 pm (UTC)(link)
While I still don't find Xander particularly interesting, this post is intriguing, and so I thank you for it. :)

[identity profile] dipenates.livejournal.com 2010-03-21 10:30 pm (UTC)(link)
That is extremely sweet of you to say, Gabs.